Content requirements for specific sports skills include

Basic technical solidification, special physical fitness matching, tactical decision-making ability, scene adaptability literacy, internal application of rules.

Taking the basic technology that everyone is most familiar with as an example, the debate between "practicing movements to death" and "understanding logic first" has been quarreling for almost ten years in the circle and has never stopped. In the past two years, he teamed up with a youth basketball coach who retired from the provincial team to run a training class. He said that when he joined the team when he was young, he was required to dribble under his hips without looking at the ball for 10 consecutive minutes. If he made a mistake, he would practice 5 more sets. He relied on muscle memory to carve the movements into his bones. There were several CUBA main guards in that group of players. But now when he is raising children born in 2000 or 10, he will first spend two weeks talking about the logic of hip force generation. Dribbling under the crotch is just the final action. The children understand the logic of force generation, and the stability of their movements after three months of practice is better than half a year of rigid practice before. Both ideas produce results, and there is no absolute right or wrong. It is just that the people they are suitable for and the training cycles are different.

When many novices first get involved in sports, they always feel that "the standard of movements is terrible." After two games and two competitions, they will know that their physical fitness cannot keep up with the specific events, and no matter how standard the movements are, they are just showy. I used to teach novices to play badminton, and there was a kid who had been practicing backhand smashes for two months in front of instructional videos. His movements were even more standard than those of the provincial team members, and he couldn't reach the net when he hit the ball. The backhand smashes required wrist explosive power, latissimus dorsi muscle contraction strength, and core stability. He didn't practice at all, and he couldn't exert force no matter how correct his movements were. This is also controversial. Fitness groups always say "practice general strength first before moving on to specialties." Most specialization coaches believe that "it is more efficient to embed strength training directly into technical movements." For example, wearing elastic bands when swinging the racket and adding weight-bearing belts when practicing dribbling can both consolidate movements and increase strength. I have tried it myself. The latter is indeed much more cost-effective for ordinary enthusiasts who can only practice three times a week. If the goal is to take a professional route, the general strength base is indeed more stable.

Another point that many people ignore is the ability to adapt to different scenarios. I used to practice long-distance running, and I could run a 10-kilometer run on the school's plastic track for a steady 40 minutes. When I ran a city marathon for the first time, the asphalt road surface was hard, and it just happened to be cool and rainy. After 25 kilometers, I ran out of steam, and my final finish was 10 minutes faster than usual. Also, you are usually used to playing on the wooden floor in an indoor basketball court, but suddenly you go to the outdoor cement floor. The ground is slippery after it has just rained. You dare not use the steps you are used to, changing directions and taking off with all your strength. You have to take the initiative to change the stride length and lower the take-off height, otherwise you will sprain your foot in minutes. This is even more obvious for professional athletes. Usually, their shooting scores in the gym are all 10 points. When they arrive at the competition venue, there are cheering spectators and crosswind interference. Whether they can maintain a stable rhythm and achieve results depends on this adaptability.

Even if your skills and body are well developed, you may be pushed and rubbed on the court. What you lack is your tactical decision-making ability. I played against a team in wild football before, and all five of them were individual visitors from the sports academy who majored in football. Every dribbling and shooting move they made could beat our team by two. As a result, we relied on the defensive counterattacks that we had practiced for two weeks in advance, and we managed to win 3:1. No matter how powerful they are individually, they just want to pass the ball when they get it. No one moves and no one is on defense. When they encounter a team with skilled cooperation, they can't touch the ball at all. There is no standard answer when it comes to tactics. In football circles, passing and controlling and counterattacking have been quarreling for decades. In table tennis circles, there are top champions for both offensive and defensive styles. To put it bluntly, tactics are not high or low. It just depends on whether you can adapt to your own abilities and whether you can restrain the opponent's advantages.

Finally, the internalization of rules, which is most easily misunderstood, does not mean that you can memorize the rules, but that you must use the rules to your own advantage. Anyone who plays basketball knows how to call a foul. You have to understand the referee's call scale. You need to know what actions can deceive the whistle by raising your hand, and what actions can cause you to commit a foul by raising your hand. ； Reasonable collisions in football, how to push the opponent's ball away with your shoulders without committing a foul, these are all the abilities to internalize the rules. There is also a conflict of ideas in this area. Many old-school athletes feel that "winning by rules is not a real skill." For example, snooker players will take the initiative to signal even if the referee does not see the foul. On the contrary, new-generation athletes feel that "maximizing points within the scope allowed by the rules is the respect for the game." Both views are reasonable. In the final analysis, the cultural atmosphere of different sports is different.

In fact, to put it bluntly, there is no unified standard for specialized sports skills. For the dimensions mentioned above, if you just play casually as a hobby on weekends and practice basic skills, you will be happy enough. If you want to compete in competitions and get results, you have to make up for your shortcomings one by one. A goal that suits you is more important than any standard.